AI has not yet earned its name. It is not yet artificial intelligence.
Right now, it is still a reflection of collective human intelligence. It learns from us —
from our patterns, our biases, our wisdom, our fragmentation, our creativity, our fear.
Which means this is still a profoundly human moment. And therefore, a profoundly human choice.
The question is not whether AI is good or bad.
The question is whether we are mature enough to discern wisely.
Earlier this week, while visiting family in Romania, I saw an advertisement for an AI-enabled
robotic system designed to feed a baby and change its nappies. Something in me was outraged.
A child's deeper developmental needs are relational. Touch. Attunement. Eye contact. Safety.
Tenderness. Without these things, we risk creating broken, wounded humans. And wounded
humans build wounded societies.
Yet during that same visit, I encountered an elderly grandmother, isolated and frail,
abandoned by the human relationships that should have held her. In that context, could
an intelligent companion technology offer dignity, support, presence, even relief?
Possibly. And that is precisely the point.
Because cities are where these questions become real. Who is really shaping your city?
Its leaders? Its citizens? Its communities? Or invisible systems few truly understand?